-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Markus Barchfeld wrote: > I would neglect backward compatibility to 3.1 for the sake of simplicity.
I agree with Markus. And on the terms of upgrading, is there an easy way to port plugins of an existing eclipse 3.1.x installation to 3.2 wi/o having to reinstall them all from their own sources? (that is one reason I haven't upgraded to 3.2.. i dont want to manually reinstall my 85 plugins) Zach -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEz3J3Myx0fW1d8G0RAmK3AJ9d6tey0AnZGFbUjtJViFOXny3FOgCdHkLZ Hk8q8gcmhh2PjQ31aAKumxk= =dDN/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
