On May 25, 2007, at 07:51, Hugh Sasse wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Eric Hodel wrote: >> On May 24, 2007, at 13:49, Daniel Berger wrote: >>> Any way to improve this? >> >> This seems to come from downloading and extracting a bulk index. I >> see similar large growth from: > > There is a Etag for this document . What about using VCDIFF to > shrink the size? RFC3284. Ruby's http module doesn't support that > out of the box. To get that into http see RFC3229. > > I can see evidence for discussion of RFC3229, but nothing from > Apache saying they finally decided to support it. One non-apache > source says 2.2 does this.
Rather than writing all that code, we could remove one (maybe two) lines for the solution Jim and I discussed (that was snipped). _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
