Eric Hodel wrote: > On Dec 26, 2007, at 14:31 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: >> Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: >>> 1. jgem? >>> >>> I saw this during the 1.0.0 install: >>> >>> install -c -m 0755 /tmp/gem /Users/headius/NetBeansProjects/jruby/ >>> bin/jgem >>> >>> Why jgem? We've been shipping with just 'gem'. >> I'd still like to know why this is the case. We don't want to ship >> RubyGems as "jgem" in JRuby. If anything, we might call it "jem", >> but I >> strongly prefer just leaving it as "gem". > > I think it should be an option in setup.rb, but I may have forgotten > to add it. It has caused some confusion, unfortunately.
Yes, it should just default to 'gem'....most people I know either do their own aliasing or prefer to have it be named 'gem'. I'll file a bug. - Charlie _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
