On 7 Apr 2008, at 17:03, Luis Lavena wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: >>> 1. jgem? >>> >>> I saw this during the 1.0.0 install: >>> >>> install -c -m 0755 /tmp/gem /Users/headius/NetBeansProjects/jruby/ >>> bin/jgem >>> >>> Why jgem? We've been shipping with just 'gem'. >> >> Can we please have the 'gem' name as default when installing on >> JRuby? >> > > Charlie: > > http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygems-developers/2008-March/003633.html > > So the thing is: if JRuby uses RubyGems, and 'ruby' executable is > labeled 'jruby', why not name rubygems 'jgem'? > > In any case, there should be a warning or something if another ruby > implementation is in the PATH...
On *nix systems, 0.9.5 moved to gem<version>, which also caused various things to break for mixed package manager vs. gem update -- system configurations. Nonetheless that seemed like a sensible thing to do, so maybe it's good to move toward one that parallels the interpreter or platform more specifically than 'major.minor ruby version'? > I don't know how to fix this and makes everybody happy... I don't know that it would make everyone happy, but printing the interpreter path or general system configuration details in a header for runs of the command might help (me, and maybe you). _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
