On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:51 PM, James Tucker <jftuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29 Sep 2010, at 18:31, Luis Lavena wrote: >> >> But, if you want it fixed, you can fork it and send the pull request, >> I would love to review it and if it works, happy to merge it. > > I would be wary to merge in any update to this feature that doesn't fix the > issues of the style I just highlighted. In fact, it should pass all of the > dependency collision spec examples that you might find in the bundler > resolver tests. If it doesn't, it's basically broken. > > As we don't have users using this feature, and it's broken, I would suggest > it should be removed by the next major release unless someone has fixed it.
Point taken, I believe it was obvious but just to clarify: review will use bundler complex dependency resolution as comparison for approval. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
