This conversation is about to take a horrible turn and I'd rather it not go that way. Let's just deprecate the command and recommend using Bundler. There's more important issues to solve with the rubygems client, such as mirroring, the progress bar, and performance enhancements if at all possible. Oh yeah, and what happened to gem metadata?
I'd love to see a roadmap and feature list laid down for 1.4 as soon as possible. Target it for RubyConf week. -Nick On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:26 PM, James Tucker <jftuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 30 Sep 2010, at 00:12, Ryan Davis wrote: > > > > > On Sep 29, 2010, at 19:57 , James Tucker wrote: > > > >> > >> On 29 Sep 2010, at 22:00, Ryan Davis wrote: > >>> I've been talking to Eric about the possibility of merging Isolate into > rubygems and he's agreed that it is a good idea. > >> > >> Why? > > > > for the same reason that `gem lock` exists, only it works and people use > it. > > Not why does Isolate exist, I mean why merge this into RubyGems? > > Isolate has the same bugs already described earlier in this thread. I know > it's "simple" by comparison to other offerings that have a feature or two in > common, I get that, but that is not a reason for RubyGems to merge it in, > especially if it doesn't actually solve bugs already described. > > _______________________________________________ > Rubygems-developers mailing list > http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems > Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers > _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
