On 30 Sep 2010, at 00:12, Ryan Davis wrote: > > On Sep 29, 2010, at 19:57 , James Tucker wrote: > >> >> On 29 Sep 2010, at 22:00, Ryan Davis wrote: >>> I've been talking to Eric about the possibility of merging Isolate into >>> rubygems and he's agreed that it is a good idea. >> >> Why? > > for the same reason that `gem lock` exists, only it works and people use it.
Not why does Isolate exist, I mean why merge this into RubyGems? Isolate has the same bugs already described earlier in this thread. I know it's "simple" by comparison to other offerings that have a feature or two in common, I get that, but that is not a reason for RubyGems to merge it in, especially if it doesn't actually solve bugs already described. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
