See below.

On Mar 11, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:

> 
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 19:12 , Evan Phoenix wrote:
> 
>> I'm working with the bundler guys to make sure we don't bust them for the 
>> release. 
> 
> cool cool... thanks.

No prob.

> 
>> Additionally, if there are other projects that have hard rubygems API 
>> dependencies, please let me know so that I can be sure add it to my list.
> 
> none that I know of, but that's probably more ignorance on my part.

Ok, well, if you think of any, let me know.

> 
> I'm mostly going to be adding API that we don't have than changing API that 
> we do. Of course, I'll probably be changing the guts of Gem.activate and 
> friends a fair amount, but now that we actually have tests on them, I 
> hopefully won't be changing them (too much) in incompatible ways.

I figured as much. Sounds good.

> 
>> Ryan, do you want to coordinate on making these changes or should we all 
>> dive in?
> 
> I'll coordinate. I have some ideas I need to get out of my head before we can 
> all dive in.

Ok, sounds good. Just let us know how you're going to proceed.

> _______________________________________________
> Rubygems-developers mailing list
> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
> Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
> 

_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to