On Mar 3, 2011, at 20:10 , Erik Hollensbe wrote: > I have some change proposals which will probably impact this rather > significantly that I've been toying around with, e.g.: > > https://gist.github.com/22fa600b8c98bdf8c785 > > It seems like implementing this would cover a lot of similar ground in spots. > Is there a chance we can talk about how this fits in (or if it does at all) > at some point? I was going to be drumming up a patch this weekend to > integrate it for your guys' review, per a conversation with Eric and Evan.
As discussed in IRC, I don't think these changes will have much, if any, impact on the work I have in mind. Most of my stuff is on the modeling side and doesn't care about the filesystem. I think this work could be done in parallel w/o too many collisions. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
