On Mar 5, 2011, at 15:49 , James Tucker wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Evan Phoenix wrote: > >> Sounds good. >> >> I'm working with the bundler guys to make sure we don't bust them for the >> release. > > I've been trying to figure out in the odd 5 minutes I can scramble, how to > get the requirements ordering regulated between 1.5 and 1.6, so far I haven't > made a working patch. They'll start seeing bug reports coming in soon where > teams are mixed between 1.6 and 1.5 rubygems. Just a heads up.
regulated == normalized? I don't think we can. The activation logic is incompatible (but improved). Working on a mixed team just smells of problems. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
