On Feb 24, 2007, at 5:36 AM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > On 2/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm > > looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more. > > Congratulations, it's a bunch of fun :) > > Will the change make the Abstract Adapter really abstract while > moving all generic SQL to "Abstract SQL Adapter" (which the current > concrete adapters would subclass instead)? Removing all SQL- > specific code from AR::Base would also be neat. > > That change would make room, for example, an adapter for XML > databases in the future!
One thing I experimented with a while back was an explicit Query object, returned by the Adapter. http://urlx.org/opendarwin.org/73585 The idea is that rather than always passing direct SQL in, developers would typically call appropriate methods on the query object, and pass that. Alas, I never got very far. However, if this is compatible with the direction things are going, I'd be happy to help out. -- Ernie P. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
