On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:59:56PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> > I hope I've made myself clear this time around. Defect reports, inasmuch as
> > they document a defect, should not be treated differently based on whether
> > there's a patch. The patch handling process is a separate issue.
>
> I see what you're saying here, and you're clearer this time around, or
> (more likely) I'm less caffeine deprived.
Unless *everyone's* caffeine deprived, I don't think I've been clear.
> I've seen two potential solutions here, either open another ticket
> when uploading a patch and reference the defect report. Or simply
> reopen the ticket with a comment saying "This is still a bug".
OK, I'll reopen tickets with that comment if they get closed for dodgy
patches.
> Ideally when rejecting a patch that's attached to a 'bug ticket' we
> can simply get rid of the [PATCH] prefix to have it excluded from the
> reports.
Well, if the patch isn't valid, the ticket doesn't really have a patch, so
that's perfectly reasonable.
- Matt
--
A few minutes ago I attempted to give a flying fsck, but the best I could do
was to watch it skitter across the floor.
-- Anthony de Boer, ASR
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
