> > > This reminds me to ask, are we gonna get rid of most of the adapters > from core for 2.0 ? I guess, only mysql and postgres and may be sqlite > deserves to be in core. Other adapter might be better off as external > libs.
Shouldn't we also have Oracle adapter in the core? With an ever increasing popularity of Rails a lot of big companies are now using it for their production quality apps and most of these run on oracle. I do agree that it won't much of a difference whether Rails has oracle libs in built or are provided as external libs. However it would be a little easy to convince the CTOs to tip the favour towards Rails if it oracle support is provided out of the box. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
