On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Piyush Ranjan wrote:
> >
> >
> > This reminds me to ask, are we gonna get rid of most of the adapters
> > from core for 2.0 ? I guess, only mysql and postgres and may be sqlite
> > deserves to be in core. Other adapter might be better off as external
> > libs.
>
>
> Shouldn't we also have Oracle adapter in the core?
[...]
> However it would be a little easy to convince the CTOs to tip the favour
> towards Rails if it oracle support is provided out of the box.
If stuff is being taken out to make this light, then I'd suggest that
a "batteries included" distribution be made available, so you can say
to 95% of people, "If you get the batteries include distro you will
(most likely) be covered".
Hugh
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---