On a slightly different note one of my friends suggested the following: You can probably make the app (apache, lighttpd or whatever) which is calling mongrel or the .fcgi re-write URLs so that e.g. http://www.site.com/:controller/:action
looks like: http://.../:site/:controller/:action and modify routes.rb, as I've done this myself, to skin an identical site in different ways. Maybe you could even re-write as below, saving yourself the route changes and maximising the separation: http://.../:site_controller/:action Which seems like a good plan? That way I can create controllers for each site and I can (presumably) inherit from a default controller for each case. What do people think? Does this actually help me at all? Thanks Jay -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
