On 11/29/06, Deco Rior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "However, I think that choosing an library because it has a nice API > > but poor internals is an unfortunate choice." > > > > This is a general statement. For me it applies to Prototype. > > > > Peter > > > So if this is really true, why would you not spend your time > improving the internals of prototype...
I don't believe in augmenting built-in object prototypes and I want a namespaced library. Both those points aside, many people have been frustrated with the Prototype community input process over the past year. Not just me. Things may be improving. Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
