Hey Jerod, I'm sorry if you felt bruised by my reply, I may have needed to word it more carefully.
Ideas are indeed welcome (if you look at the archives, you'll probably acknowledge this), but when they do not provide enough of a solution, or when it is improvable, it should be pointed out. On your side, you may have wanted to finetune your solution for better practices before posting a reply; there was no rush; other solutions were already there, and the OP mentioned he was going to go with tabindexes (which is good from an accessibility standpoint, BTW). Also, I believe my Spinoffs-related remark stands: considering this group is about Prototype and script.aculo.us, you should try to provide a solution that leverages what's useful in these (case in point, Prototype). In another context, I would have provided a patched version of your solution, but since other solutions were already posted, I didn't feel the need. I'm sorry, again, that you felt chastised. It certainly wasn't my intention. Any good will is welcome here, but we should all strive to post code that leverages as much best practice and Prototypishness as possible. Sincerely, -- Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
