On 19 July 2013 14:59, David <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes exactly. It's specific to the word 'record'. It works when I change it > to :foo or :b (or anything else). > > Are there any reserved words for association names?
It would appear that the answer to that question is yes. Colin > > On Friday, July 19, 2013 3:38:57 PM UTC+2, Colin Law wrote: >> >> On 19 July 2013 11:32, David <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I discovered a weird behavior when using a "belongs_to: record" >> > association >> > in Rails 4. >> > >> > Given two models A and B: >> > >> > class A < ActiveRecord::Base >> > belongs_to :record, class_name: 'B', foreign_key: 'b_id' >> > end >> > >> > class B < ActiveRecord::Base >> > end >> > >> > When creating A, it inserts a record in B and returns A with id of nil: >> > >> > irb(main):001:0> A.create! >> > (0.1ms) begin transaction >> > SQL (0.4ms) INSERT INTO "bs" DEFAULT VALUES >> > (2.4ms) commit transaction >> > => #<A id: nil, b_id: 1> >> > >> > A.count # => 0 >> > B.count # => 1 >> > >> > It used to work in Rails 3. >> >> In the subject line you indicate that problem is specific to using the >> word 'record' with belongs_to. Is that correct? In other words do >> you get the same error with belongs_to :foo, ..... >> >> Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAL%3D0gLuQxLTFeYC7EYuvLad7JxJoUqTkZ1CxJ73S7GSKVuhb9A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
