It would be weird if there are some reserved words for association names... and they are not documented.
On Friday, July 19, 2013 4:15:14 PM UTC+2, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote: > > Colin Law wrote in post #1116001: > > On 19 July 2013 14:59, David <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Yes exactly. It's specific to the word 'record'. It works when I change > it > >> to :foo or :b (or anything else). > >> > >> Are there any reserved words for association names? > > > > It would appear that the answer to that question is yes. > > Although that might have been unintentional. I don't know of any > "official" reserved word list for association names. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/0f83d777-343d-47b3-9dab-1bac391518b1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
