On 19 July 2013 17:02, Walter Lee Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Colin Law wrote: > >> On 19 July 2013 15:24, David <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It would be weird if there are some reserved words for association names... >>> and they are not documented. >> >> It may well be reserved in other situations also. No reserved words >> are documented as far as I know. > > I started one here: http://reservedwords.herokuapp.com > > I scraped the Rails Wiki before it went entirely away, and I also found > another list somewhere (maybe StackOverflow) and merged the two. Only two > people ever signed up to add more words, so it kind of died on the vine. If > you want to contribute, you are certainly welcome to do so.
Am I the only one to be continually embarrassed when google turns up results showing that I should have known the answer already? It appears that it was my suggestion that you started that list. [1] I have made sure to bookmark the url now and if I find a new one will update it. Could I suggest you make the title "Reserved Words in Ruby on Rails" as my initial search included the word ruby so yours did not turn up. I usually include ruby when searching for rails as it reduces the number of rolling stock hits. Colin [1] https://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/3608697 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAL%3D0gLuEb4SKUZtr_qPTN6rSRsheps5FDPhW1AuW8uHG2hOKXw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
