Colin Law wrote: [...] >> [...] >> I'd actually support a syntax for union queries such as >> Person.union_scope(:scope_a, :scope_b). This makes it obvious that it >> is not a simple scope chain, while still being simple to call. > > Is that not what the OP was asking for in the original post to quote > from there: > >> Is it possible to have two named scopes that can be joined using OR >> condition. > > To which you replied: > >> Goodness, I hope not. That would be a terrible misuse of named_scopes.
I had thought that the OP was specifically asking about named_scope chaining with OR as in the other thread. On rereading, however, it seems that you're right and I misunderstood the question. > > Colin Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
