pepe wrote in post #949641: >> Please don't mislead people about the features of editors. > > Not trying to. If you read more carefully you'll notice that I didn't > even try to mention a single feature of text editors, among other > things because I don't really know much about them. I was solely > commenting on IDEs capabilities and why I use them.
You said you like IDEs because of global search and replace capabilities; you seemed to be implying that other editors couldn't do that. But you yourself have just admitted that you don't know much about text editors, so how can you effectively draw comparisons between them and IDEs? Or did you mean something else entirely? [...] > Still better to have a computer that helps you and saves you time than > doing the searching, etc. by hand, IMHO. Things might not be perfect > but can save you time. And you don't need an IDE for that. > >> apidock.com is probably the ugliest and most confusing docs site I've >> seen. Have you triedhttp://www.railsapi.com? > > Yes I have as well as other sources, as I am sure you do too. The fact > that you don't like something does not mean others will not or won't > find it useful. Of course it doesn't. I just wanted to be sure you were aware of what I consider to be a superior alternative. > And the fact that I only mentioned a couple of sites > does not mean that those are the only ones I use or would recommend, > they are just a couple of examples where the OP could find some > information. Sure. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
