On 24 December 2010 14:31, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin Law wrote in post #970471: >> On 24 December 2010 12:16, Gordon Yeong <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> You have not provided the gem list output >>> >>> >>> Here: >>> >>> ------- Start ----- >>> *** LOCAL GEMS *** >>> actionmailer (2.3.9) >>> actionpack (2.3.9) >>> activemodel (3.0.3) >>> activerecord (3.0.3, 2.3.9) >> >> So you have some rails gems from 2.3.9, some from 3.0.3 and some from >> both, and in environment.rb you ask for 2.3.5. I don't know why that >> would cause it to say it was loading 2.3.2 > > Probably because it's picking up 2.3.2 from vendor/rails.
Good point, I had not thought of that. I should have done. > >> but it is certainly never >> going to work as it is. > > Why do you say that? I said it because I had not thought of a version frozen in vendor, which I think is a perfectly good reason for saying it, even though as a statement of truth it is fatally flawed :) Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
