hello, Colin, I shall do so. Thank you and Merry x'mas! Gordon :)
On 25 December 2010 19:51, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 December 2010 06:27, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Gordon Yeong wrote in post #970555: > > [...] > >> Problem solved but i somehow think removing > >> vendor/rails is not so right.... > > > > Where did you get that idea? Removing vendor/rails is exactly right in > > this case -- it's only purpose is to override the system Rails gems. If > > you want to freeze 2.3.8 into vendor/rails, you can do so. > > > > Note, however, that 2.3.9, and I think 2.3.8, have serious security > > holes. I'd recommend upgrading to 2.3.10 as soon as possible. > > Also don't forget that when you change the version you should run > rake rails:update > to update rails scripts etc. > > Colin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
