On 25 December 2010 17:27, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gordon Yeong wrote in post #970555: > [...] > > Problem solved but i somehow think removing > > vendor/rails is not so right.... > > Where did you get that idea? Removing vendor/rails is exactly right in > this case -- it's only purpose is to override the system Rails gems. If > you want to freeze 2.3.8 into vendor/rails, you can do so. > Marnen, you were right on the money! "Probably because it's picking up 2.3.2 from vendor/rails.". thank you for that :) > > Note, however, that 2.3.9, and I think 2.3.8, have serious security > holes. I'd recommend upgrading to 2.3.10 as soon as possible. > > Yep, I m testing the application and making sure it works on 2.3.8. Once it is stable, I shall look at 2.3.10 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
