On 01/09/2010 15:38, Yusuke Yamamoto wrote: > Actually I contacted Red Hat's QA engineers first. > And they told me that legal dept. - Richard Fontana - will get back to me. > But so far I got no meaningful response. And it's been over two months. The response was meaningful, it just wasn't the response you wanted. He said no, and that the matter is closed.
Mark > On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Eric Schabell wrote: > >> I think someone needs to look a bit closer at this story, as you have the >> PROJECT Drools which is not the same as the PRODUCTS produced and supported >> by Red Hat. >> >> Red Hat does not 'own' the Drools project, it just sponsors the project a >> lot and pays some of the developers to do what they do. >> >> I am not surprised that Red Hat legal dept does not respond, they have >> nothing to respond to. >> >> Regards, erics >> >> ----- "Yusuke Yamamoto"<[email protected]> wrote: >>> I understand you, but Red Hat legal dept. doesn't responding and there's no >>> other place to talk this matter. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
