Nobody ever proposed a "software loom". Hits too close to home, eh? -W
On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > LOL. > > Why re-invent the wheel indeed... unless Mark wants better separation of > terms for "guvnor" and "uberfire" (that is our workbench framework)... > Mark? > > "Bench" is good for me (in fact, I'm pretty comfortable with anything.. as > much I care.. I just don't want to have to do the renaming twice). Taking > it further, why not simply "Drools Workbench": org.drools.wb. > > On 2 April 2013 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio" >> > instead of "Environment"? >> > >> >> Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench. >> Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future? >> >> -W >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
