Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE? Mark On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will be starting the split tomorrow. > > > > On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with > something they prefer in the RHT product names. > > We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under IWE. > Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement and have > IWB - Integrated WorkBench. > > Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's > thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search for > a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This > framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases. > > IDE - Integrated Development Environment > IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment. > IWB - Integrated WorkBench > AWD - Advanced WorkBench > > Mark > > On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio" > >> instead of "Environment"? > >> > > > > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench. > > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future? > > > > -W > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-dev mailing list > > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
