I've updated the document<https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1zovHiCJu0TnlKDuSq4xvRcuhThiR7G3ZdOWobooerdc/edit>to reflect our discussions.
I will need 2 new droolsjbpm repositories: drools-iwb and kie-iwb-shared; Geoffrey, Mark can you please create these (if you are in agreement)? I have notionally included jBPM on the diagram to illustrate how consistency across KIE could be achieved. I am not restructuring their modules. With kind regards, Mike On 10 April 2013 20:22, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was going to use the following Group/Artifact IDs: > > org.drools:drools-iwb for Drools editors > > org.kie:guvnor for generic Guvnor. > > org.kie:kie-iwb-shared for the module for things that both Drools and jBPM > editors need. > > I'd plan on kie-ide becoming kie-iwb. > On 10 Apr 2013 19:19, "Mark Proctor" <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > >> Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE? >> >> Mark >> On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I will be starting the split tomorrow. >> >> >> >> On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: >> >>> studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap >>> with something they prefer in the RHT product names. >>> >>> We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under >>> IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement >>> and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench. >>> >>> Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's >>> thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search >>> for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This >>> framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases. >>> >>> IDE - Integrated Development Environment >>> IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment. >>> IWB - Integrated WorkBench >>> AWD - Advanced WorkBench >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio" >>> >> instead of "Environment"? >>> >> >>> > >>> > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench. >>> > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future? >>> > >>> > -W >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-dev mailing list >>> > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
