I think QA analysis should find some of those problems. Did you try it? As
far as I know, it looks for range completeness, missing gaps, etc.

Best Regards,

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


2010/12/30 Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]>

> The general case would be extremely difficult to solve. It would require
> heavy expression manipulation. Consider a very simple variation:
>    X($f: foo)
>    Y(bar == $f)
> as compared to
>    Y($b: bar)
>    X(foo == $b)
>
> And you can play this game at any level of complexity.
>
> And even your "straightforward" case would require the consideration of
> rule attributes, since there would not be a conflict if they are in
> different agenda groups, etc.
>
>
> -W
>
>
>
> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>:
> > The conflict is like :
> >
> > E.g.
> > If (X = 90) then Score = 10;
> > If (X = 90) then Score = 100;
> >
> > Can the BRMS detect this?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Please define "conflict".
> >> -W
> >>
> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>:
> >> > I would like to check if there is any conflict among the created rules
> >> > in
> >> > the BRMS 5.1.  Can the QA/Verify can check this out?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun <
> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Please don't assume that everybody knows which "features" and
> >> >> which "conflicts" and which "checks" you have in mind.
> >> >> -W
> >> >>
> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can anyone know whether QA features can provide the rule conflict
> >> >> > checks?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Benson Fung
> >> > Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China
> >> > | Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan Avenue,
> >> > Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell :
> 852-98369898
> >> > ||
> >> > [email protected] || http://www.hk.redhat.com||
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to