This is because the scenario you are describing is not always an error/warning. Maybe for you it is an error, but for other people could be a typical situation. I.e: if you have audit rules.
Best Regards, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Esteban Aliverti - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]> > Yes, I tried QA analysis. But it only can find out the problems of the > individual rules like what you said. I tried to develop two rules with > sames conditions but different consequences and do the QA analysis, it > cannot detect it unfortunately. :( > > > > > 2010/12/30 Esteban Aliverti <[email protected]> > > I think QA analysis should find some of those problems. Did you try it? As >> far as I know, it looks for range completeness, missing gaps, etc. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> >> Esteban Aliverti >> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com >> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com >> >> >> 2010/12/30 Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> >> >> The general case would be extremely difficult to solve. It would require >>> heavy expression manipulation. Consider a very simple variation: >>> X($f: foo) >>> Y(bar == $f) >>> as compared to >>> Y($b: bar) >>> X(foo == $b) >>> >>> And you can play this game at any level of complexity. >>> >>> And even your "straightforward" case would require the consideration of >>> rule attributes, since there would not be a conflict if they are in >>> different agenda groups, etc. >>> >>> >>> -W >>> >>> >>> >>> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>: >>> > The conflict is like : >>> > >>> > E.g. >>> > If (X = 90) then Score = 10; >>> > If (X = 90) then Score = 100; >>> > >>> > Can the BRMS detect this? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Wolfgang Laun < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Please define "conflict". >>> >> -W >>> >> >>> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>: >>> >> > I would like to check if there is any conflict among the created >>> rules >>> >> > in >>> >> > the BRMS 5.1. Can the QA/Verify can check this out? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Please don't assume that everybody knows which "features" and >>> >> >> which "conflicts" and which "checks" you have in mind. >>> >> >> -W >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>: >>> >> >> > Hi, >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Can anyone know whether QA features can provide the rule conflict >>> >> >> > checks? >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Thanks >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> > rules-users mailing list >>> >> >> > [email protected] >>> >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> rules-users mailing list >>> >> >> [email protected] >>> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Benson Fung >>> >> > Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China >>> >> > | Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan >>> Avenue, >>> >> > Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell : >>> 852-98369898 >>> >> > || >>> >> > [email protected] || http://www.hk.redhat.com|| >>> >> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > rules-users mailing list >>> >> > [email protected] >>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> rules-users mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
