Yes, I tried QA analysis. But it only can find out the problems of the individual rules like what you said. I tried to develop two rules with sames conditions but different consequences and do the QA analysis, it cannot detect it unfortunately. :(
2010/12/30 Esteban Aliverti <[email protected]> > I think QA analysis should find some of those problems. Did you try it? As > far as I know, it looks for range completeness, missing gaps, etc. > > Best Regards, > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > Esteban Aliverti > - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com > - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com > > > 2010/12/30 Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> > > The general case would be extremely difficult to solve. It would require >> heavy expression manipulation. Consider a very simple variation: >> X($f: foo) >> Y(bar == $f) >> as compared to >> Y($b: bar) >> X(foo == $b) >> >> And you can play this game at any level of complexity. >> >> And even your "straightforward" case would require the consideration of >> rule attributes, since there would not be a conflict if they are in >> different agenda groups, etc. >> >> >> -W >> >> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>: >> > The conflict is like : >> > >> > E.g. >> > If (X = 90) then Score = 10; >> > If (X = 90) then Score = 100; >> > >> > Can the BRMS detect this? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Please define "conflict". >> >> -W >> >> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>: >> >> > I would like to check if there is any conflict among the created >> rules >> >> > in >> >> > the BRMS 5.1. Can the QA/Verify can check this out? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun < >> [email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Please don't assume that everybody knows which "features" and >> >> >> which "conflicts" and which "checks" you have in mind. >> >> >> -W >> >> >> >> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <[email protected]>: >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Can anyone know whether QA features can provide the rule conflict >> >> >> > checks? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks >> >> >> > >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > rules-users mailing list >> >> >> > [email protected] >> >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> rules-users mailing list >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Benson Fung >> >> > Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China >> >> > | Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan >> Avenue, >> >> > Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell : >> 852-98369898 >> >> > || >> >> > [email protected] || http://www.hk.redhat.com|| >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > rules-users mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> rules-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
