On 27 April 2015 at 21:53, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/04/15 17:50, Martin Lucina wrote: >> >> I think including "remote" in the name would be good; it makes it more >> obvious that the repo contains tools to "remotely control a rump >> something". >> >> If not rumprun-remote (since that implies relation with rumprun-* which is >> not true), then how about just rump-remote? > > > That doesn't a) precisely define what "remote" is b) doesn't convey what > "rump-remote" does. The first one might not be an issue, but the latter one > definitely is. For comparison, a web browser is not called a html-remote. > > I'm sort of tempted to suggest rump-remotecontrol, but I'm not sure if that > reminds me more of Leisure Suit Larry 1 or one very old "How to speak > Australian" commercial.
Or shorten to rumpcontrol, which is almost back to the beginning but with less abbreviation... No preference... j
