On Monday, 27.04.2015 at 20:53, Antti Kantee wrote: > On 27/04/15 17:50, Martin Lucina wrote: > >I think including "remote" in the name would be good; it makes it more > >obvious that the repo contains tools to "remotely control a rump > >something". > > > >If not rumprun-remote (since that implies relation with rumprun-* which is > >not true), then how about just rump-remote? > > That doesn't a) precisely define what "remote" is b) doesn't convey > what "rump-remote" does. The first one might not be an issue, but > the latter one definitely is. For comparison, a web browser is not > called a html-remote. > > I'm sort of tempted to suggest rump-remotecontrol, but I'm not sure > if that reminds me more of Leisure Suit Larry 1 or one very old "How > to speak Australian" commercial.
Cute :-) > Why is it necessary to emphasize remote, i.e. why are you worried > that someone might confuse it for controlling "opposite of remote"? "control" without "remote" feels a bit too generic, hence the emphasis. However, no huge preference either way. >
