On Thursday, 30.04.2015 at 14:53, Antti Kantee wrote: > >So, looks like nginx on rumprun-xen is 7-10% faster than NetBSD, but about > >30% slower than Linux. > > Curious, because in my qemu experiments rumprun-baremetal and Linux > were within 1-2%. I wonder if the network driver we use on Xen is > really that bad -- can't think of much other difference between > baremetal and xen, especially since they're now almost entirely the > same apart from I/O devices.
If the mini-os netfront driver was the culprit, wouldn't we have lower performance than stock NetBSD?
