On 30/04/15 15:06, Martin Lucina wrote:
On Thursday, 30.04.2015 at 14:53, Antti Kantee wrote:
So, looks like nginx on rumprun-xen is 7-10% faster than NetBSD, but about
30% slower than Linux.
Curious, because in my qemu experiments rumprun-baremetal and Linux
were within 1-2%. I wonder if the network driver we use on Xen is
really that bad -- can't think of much other difference between
baremetal and xen, especially since they're now almost entirely the
same apart from I/O devices.
If the mini-os netfront driver was the culprit, wouldn't we have lower
performance than stock NetBSD?
How does that follow?
