On 28/07/14 14:39, Jens Staal wrote: > Hi > > I have been "off the radar" for a bit due to other commitments, but how do you > envisage that this should affect OBS packaging? Will there be other sets of > tarballs published and some sort of new recommended package naming scheme?
Hi Jens, Thanks for asking the question I've spent months trying to answer, and, since I noticed it's a difficult one, to avoid ;) Some adhoc-envisaging: rumprun-posix is essentially the current buildrump.sh package, plus more. Since I don't imagine there's much demand for rumprun-posix minus more, rumprun-posix would replace the buildrump.sh package. The rumprun-foo packages would also come with an optional rumprun-foo-drvdev add-on, which would install a toolchain and kernel sources necessary for building the drv repos. Against that sudden illumination, maybe it's better to include the platform name in the drv repos? e.g. drv-posix-netif-netmap. Or is that getting too bureaucratized? - antti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
