On Jul 28, 2014 5:04 PM, "Antti Kantee" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 28/07/14 14:38, Justin Cormack wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2014 4:32 PM, "Antti Kantee" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Like already discussed in the "rethinking buildrump.sh etc." thread, we
>>> want to rename the repos so that repos which do the same thing have
>>> similar names.  Nobody objected then, but there have been a few
>>> adjustments, so here's a quick rundown of what's planned to happen in a
>>> day or so:
>>
>>
>> All looks fine except drv-pcibus-userspace is a bit odd. Drv-pcibus-linux
>> might be better given its pretty specific.
>
>
> There's nothing there which specifically limits support to Linux.  Sure,
there will be 0 shared lines of code in case e.g. FreeBSD support is grown,
but I think there would be more or less 0 shared lines of code between e.g.
uio and vfio on Linux too.
>
> I don't think we need a separate repo for every doohickey driver we can
think of.  Grouping them together a bit makes finding stuff from
repo.rumpkernel.org O(log n) instead of O(n)  ;)
>
> Also see the other mail to Jens.
>

How about just having one repo called drivers for all drivers not (yet)
upstreamed to NetBSD and having it able to build everything from dpdk to
PCI with a top level makefile?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users

Reply via email to