On 24/10/14 15:12, Martin Lucina wrote: > [email protected] said: >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Ok, do you mind if I add RETURN VALUE sections to these manpages which >>> state explicitly that these function return zero on success and a NetBSD >>> errno on failure? >>> >>> If I make my changes as diffs against the manpages and send them to the >>> list can you or Justin commit them to NetBSD, assuming you're happy with >>> them? >> >> Sure. > > Here you go. I added the missing section to rump_etfs.3 and also added it > to rump_lwproc.3 despite it repeating information already in the function > descriptions -- speaking from experience I have been known to go search for > RETURN VALUE in manpages in anger :-)
Hmm, apparently Justin promised that I'd commit them ... And so I did. The fixed versions should appear on man.netbsd.org tomorrow. > I don't know if I should update the .Dd or not, no idea what the > conventions for that in NetBSD are. Almost nobody knows, but luckily we have a daemon which automatically fixes manpage errors (see "man wizd"). Usually wizd bumps the .Dd value a lot, so I did that before commit. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
