Martin Lucina writes ("Re: [PATCH] app-tools: Support old -D__RUMPUSER_XEN__
for now"):
> [email protected] said:
> > If you would prefer to make stable branches of rumprun-xen then that
> > would be fine of course, and we could use those for tests of stable
> > branches of Xen. I didn't think you'd want to do that.
>
> Stable branches, no, not yet. I was thinking just of cutting a
> "xen-4.5-stable" tag specifically for you to run the xen-stable tests off.
If we do that and discover a bug in it that we should fix for Xen 4.5
users, we'll be stuck.
> Or would that not be enough to solve the problem (us having to keep around
> old -D, you having to backport new -D to Xen 4.5)?
We don't mind doing the backport. It's just not instantaneous. Our
stable branch release cycles aren't particularly fast.
Ian.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
