On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Graydon Hoare <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eh, unclear to me. I am partial to the existing syntax (reads like > do-notation, which I think we're keeping) and avoids breaking tons of code > and adding a keyword. Also supports no-arg iteration like: > I guess I wasn't specifically referring to this issue. Sorry for not being clearer :) I am not really partial to either for syntax proposals.
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
