However, I want to highlight it is really appreciable that you, the rust team, are so open to our question.
Just wanted to give you this feedback, I don't want to be held like the guy who criticize the current work, I know very much that is could be very annoying. Just willing to help :) ----- Gaetan 2013/11/19 Gaetan <[email protected]> > I think this is precisely one of the bigest issue, from a newbee point of > view. And I agree with spir on this point. It's not that important, but you > end up placing them everywhere "to make the compiler happy". > > ~str should be a ~T. If it is not, it should use another semantic. > > However, I don't see where you explain this subtility in the tutorial, > didn't you added it recently? > > PS: I'm french, I know pretty well that all subtilities (other words for > "exception to the general rules") my natural language has their own reason, > BUT if I wanted to redesign french, I would get rid of all these rules, > exceptions, rules in the exceptions. And exceptions in the rules of > exceptions... > > ----- > Gaetan > > > > 2013/11/19 Daniel Micay <[email protected]> > >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Gaetan <[email protected]> wrote: >> > "The most common use case for owned boxes is creating recursive data >> > structures like a binary search tree." >> > >> > I don't think this is the most common use of owned boxes: string >> management, >> > ... >> > >> > I don't think it a good idea to place "binary search tree" in a >> tutorial. >> > You don't do this every day :) >> > >> > ----- >> > Gaetan >> >> ~str isn't an ~T, in the existing type system >> > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
