What about @/Gc<> types then? You could still potentially reuse them.
-- Ziad On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Tommi <rusty.ga...@icloud.com> wrote: > While I'm trying to argue why the proposed solution is not a full solution > to the proposed problem, I don't even think that the proposed problem is a > problem. Here's why: if you make a call foo(arg) and never use arg after > that, then you don't care if arg gets moved or borrowed. And if you try > to use arg afterwards and foo did in fact move it previously, then your > IDE is going to tell you about it by drawing a red squiggly line under that > incorrect use of arg. > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
