> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:39:19 +0100 > From: Marc Lehmann <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Generic icon shown in Task List and alt+tab list > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:25:32AM +0530, > [email protected] wrote: > > Do I rightly infer from > > > http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt. > 7.pod#CONFIGUR > > E_OPTIONS that --enable-pixbuf is better than > --enable-afterimage in that a) > > it does not increase urxvt's memory footprint as much and > b) it does not > > require any special library such as libafterimage to be installed? > > a) yes b) boils down to what a special library is - pixbuf is > certainly > available on a lot more systems than libafterimage. > > > If so, are there any reasons against using --enable-pixbuf > instead of > > --enable-afterimage? > > only backwards compatibility - some features (that we deemed > illogical, > broken or otherwsie undesirable) have changed or have been removed. > > -- > The choice of a Deliantra, the free > code+content MORPG > -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net > ----==-- _ generation > ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann > --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected] > -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Thanks Marc (and Emanuele for the earlier mail) :-) Have built with pixbuf instead of libafterimage and tests OK. (neither library is installed by Slackware 13.1) Best Charles _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
