On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:47:06AM -0400, Jim Diamond wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 15:32 (+0100), Emanuele Giaquinta wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:35:44AM -0400, Jim Diamond wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:54 (+0100), Emanuele Giaquinta wrote:
>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:47:48AM -0400, Jim Diamond wrote:
> >>>> Speaking of the to-do list, yes, it has problems on 9.14. Aside from
> >>>> the unused space (*) problem the perl module ends up with some strange
> >>>> notions of the terminal size and my mods work around them in as
> >>>> general a way as I was able to figure out with the time I had.
> >>>> Unfortunately, changes in 9.14 changed the perl module's idea of the
> >>>> terminal size, and I don't have time right now to work through those.
> >>>> If anyone else does I'd be very happy to get the updates to make it
> >>>> work for 9.14, even if they are not backwards-compatible.
>
> >>>> (*) I thought I saw something in the 9.13 or 9.14 change log saying a
> >>>> fix was put in to avoid unused space, but for me I have none in 9.12
> >>>> and I have it in 9.14, even with the "tabbed" extension. Specifically
> >>>> - fix a redraw bug that occurs when a bg pixmap is set and the
> >>>> wm does not honour the size hints set by urxvt. Now urxvt
> >>>> forces the size of the terminal window to be a multiple of
> >>>> the cell size.
> >>>> I am a bit confused by the second sentence, since 9.12 doesn't seem to
> >>>> have the problem, but 9.14 does. But maybe it is only when a bg
> >>>> pixmap is set.
>
> >>> Which WM do you use?
> >> fvwm2
>
> >>> If the WM honors the size hints set by urxvt there should be no
> >>> change between 9.12 and 9.14, also in $term->{width,height}.
>
> >> 9.12: in tabbedex's on_start(), width = 560, height = 312
> >> in the first call to on_resize_all_windows(),
> >> the args are 560 and 303
> >> and self->{term}->width = 560 and self->{term}->height = 303
> >> and self->width is 560, self->height is 303
>
> >> 9.14: in tabbedex's on_start(), width = 560, height = 312
> >> in the first call to on_resize_all_windows(),
> >> the args are 555 and 303
> >> and self->{term}->width = 553 and self->{term}->height = 299
> >> and self->width is 553, self->height is 299
>
> >> As you see, there are differences in the height and width.
>
> > Yes, and the difference is probably due to the fact that 555 and 303 are
> > not a multiple of fwidth / fheight. urxvt 9.14 aligns the size of the
> > terminal window to a multiple of the font size. The question is why
> > tabbedx is unable to cope with this.
>
> I assume you meant "tabbedex" when you said "tabbedx".
yes.
> But on your system, if you use
> urxvt -pe tabbed
> does the window have the right size for the number of lines? On my
> system I end up with almost (but not quite) enough empty space for
> another line of text at the bottom of the window.
That sounds correct. The space is there but, since it is not enough for
another full line, it is not used.
Emanuele
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
