On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:39:10 -0400 Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with your argument on dl_dst_mask. I only added that to my patch > because it was already there. > > LGTM. > > Reviewed-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[email protected]> Thanks, applied the patch. > But, the OF version is based on the controller/switch handshake, and > the application wouldn't have any control over that. > So, an app specific to OF1.0 won't work if a switch is handshaked with > OF1.2. right? As Simon mentioned, I was thinking about adding a feature that enable applications to specifiy OF versions. > I think the long-term solution would be an abstraction on top of > these. But, as you mentioned, it would be complex to write a proper > one. Yeah. Ryu supports multiple OF versions so you can do experiments to get a clear idea about "a proper" API. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
