Sorry for the late reply. On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:46 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:24 -0400 > Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree with Simon. That would be the only way to support >> application-specified OF version. > > I posted a patch to enables applications to specifiy OF version"s".
Thanks for the patch. >> But then I believe all apps would opt for OF1.0, because if an >> application specifies its highest supported version as 1.2, it needs >> to write the code to support different versions of OF. So, basically >> the App would end-up implementing that complicated unified API. > > I'm not sure. At least, it's not the case for us. > > We have applications that need features supported in OF1.2 and the > newer version(s). No point for them to support OF1.0 and 1.1. That's true. The only application that comes to my mind is when we have a switch that only supports OF 1.0, and we have applications that support OF1.2 and above. But that's really a corner case. Best, Soheil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
