On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:48:09 +0900 (JST) FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:42:45 +0900 > Yuichi Ito <[email protected]> wrote: > >> some switches return the instruction list of flow_mod messages in the >> different order. >> >> for example, when a flow entry was installed with the instructions as: >> >> [ >> OFPInstructionMeter(meter_id=1), >> OFPInstructionActions(actions=[OFPActionOutput(port=2)]) >> ] >> >> the flow_stats message may return the flow entry with the instructions as: >> >> [ >> OFPInstructionActions(actions=[OFPActionOutput(port=2)]), >> OFPInstructionMeter(meter_id=1) >> ] >> >> this patch makes tester.py ignore the order different. > > Hmm, the order matters from the perspective of OF spec? I do not think so. I think that the order of instructions is not specified in OF spec. In section 5.9 'Instructions', only the execution sequence is specified. Since the spec said "a set of instructions", I think that it is in random order. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
