On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:04:22 +0900 Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:48:09AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:42:45 +0900 >> Yuichi Ito <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> some switches return the instruction list of flow_mod messages in the >>> different order. >>> >>> for example, when a flow entry was installed with the instructions as: >>> >>> [ >>> OFPInstructionMeter(meter_id=1), >>> OFPInstructionActions(actions=[OFPActionOutput(port=2)]) >>> ] >>> >>> the flow_stats message may return the flow entry with the instructions as: >>> >>> [ >>> OFPInstructionActions(actions=[OFPActionOutput(port=2)]), >>> OFPInstructionMeter(meter_id=1) >>> ] >>> >>> this patch makes tester.py ignore the order different. >> >> Hmm, the order matters from the perspective of OF spec? > > I may be missing the point, but my understanding is that the order > that instructions are processed is defined in the OF spec and as > such it shouldn't mater what order they are provided in messages. I have the same opinion. thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
