Hello,
There are some similarities in technologies. The main difference, if I
understood KNet, is that the focus of KatharĂ¡ is on network switches being
on containers, not different from network nodes. This allows us to use not
only Ryu for SDN, but also P4 switches and traditional ones (ospf, bgp, rip
and so on). The focus of our application is to simulate realistic network
environments, not only SDN.



Il 11 feb 2018 05:35, "knet solutions" <knetsolutio...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to share with you KatharĂ¡ (kathara.org/
>> <https://github.com/Kidel/Kathara>), an open source
>> simulation environment based on Docker containers which has been
>> developed in the Computer Network Research Group at Roma Tre University (
>> http://www.dia.uniroma3.it/~compunet/www/view/group.php?id=compunet).
>>
>>
>
> This looks cool, similar to KNet.
>
> --
>
> *Regards, *
>
> *Suresh KumarKnet solutions.*
>
> https://github.com/knetsolutions/KNet
> http://knet-topology-builder.readthedocs.io/
> http://knetsolutions.in/
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

Reply via email to